Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6328

8 / 8

5,306

+0.2%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1230L v3

4 / 8

5,297

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6328

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1230L v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌360% higher power demand at 115W vs 25W.

Xeon E3-1230L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 115W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6328 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,297 vs 5,306).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6328 better than Xeon E3-1230L v3?

Yes. Opteron 6328 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6328 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6328 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6328 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6328 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $575 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1230L v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6328

The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.

Xeon E3-1230L v3

The Xeon E3-1230L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,297 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6328 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1230L v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1230L v3 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Opteron 6328 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Opteron 6328 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1230L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6328 scores 5,306 against the Xeon E3-1230L v3's 5,297 — a 0.2% lead for the Opteron 6328. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6328 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1230L v3.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E3-1230L v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+78%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,306	5,297

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6328 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1230L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.