Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1245

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1245 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6328

8 / 8

5,306

0.0%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1245

4 / 8

5,346

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6328

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,306 vs 5,346).
❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌21.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 95W.

Xeon E3-1245

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 95W instead of 115W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6328 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6328 better than Xeon E3-1245?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6328 is ahead with a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1245 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1245 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6328 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6328 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $575 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1245 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 6328 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E3-1245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6328

The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.

Xeon E3-1245

The Xeon E3-1245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,346 points. Launch price was $350.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6328 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 6328 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Opteron 6328 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6328 scores 5,306 against the Xeon E3-1245's 5,346 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1245. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E3-1245
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	5,306	5,346

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6328 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.