Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E5-2430L

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E5-2430L Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6328

8 / 8

5,306

+0.1%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2430L

6 / 12

5,300

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E5-2430L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E5-2430L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6328

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌
4.4% HIGHER MSRP
$575 MSRPvs$551 MSRP
❌91.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 60W.

Xeon E5-2430L

2012

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($551 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Draws 60W instead of 115W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6328 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,300 vs 5,306).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6328 better than Xeon E5-2430L?

Yes. Opteron 6328 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6328 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6328 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6328 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2430L is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Opteron 6328 comes in 4.4% more expensive on MSRP at $575 MSRP versus $551 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2430L is also 4.2% better value on MSRP (9.6 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2430L is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Opteron 6328 vs Xeon E5-2430L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6328

The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.

Xeon E5-2430L

The Xeon E5-2430L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,300 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6328 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2430L offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430L — a 41.3% clock advantage for the Opteron 6328 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 6328 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2430L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6328 scores 5,306 against the Xeon E5-2430L's 5,300 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron 6328. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6328 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2430L.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E5-2430L
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+52%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15360 kB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	5,306	5,300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6328 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2430L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E5-2430L
Socket	G34	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6328 was priced at $575, while the Xeon E5-2430L came in at $551. On launch pricing ($575 vs $551), Xeon E5-2430L was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6328 delivers 9.2 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2430L — making the Xeon E5-2430L the 4.1% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Xeon E5-2430L
MSRP	$575	$551-4%
Performance per Dollar	9.2	9.6+4%
Release Date	2012	2012

Search Opteron 6328 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2430L on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.