P102-100 vs GRID T4-1Q

P102-100

2018Core: 1582 MHzBoost: 1683 MHz

GRID T4-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

P102-100

250

3,301

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

GRID T4-1Q

225

3,303

+0.1%

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The P102-100 is positioned at rank 201 and the GRID T4-1Q is on rank 304, so the P102-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar P102-100

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

99%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

98%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

97%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

93%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

91%

#186

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2686%

#201

P102-100

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#203

Quadro FX 2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#206

FirePro V3900

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

96%

#207

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

MSRP: $119|Avg: $89

96%

#208

Tesla K8

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

93%

#210

GRID K240Q

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

92%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

92%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

92%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

91%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

91%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-1Q

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

89%

#289

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8394%

#304

GRID T4-1Q

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600

100%

#305

NVS 310

MSRP: $159|Avg: $10

98%

#306

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

98%

#307

FirePro 3D V3750

MSRP: $199|Avg: $25

97%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

97%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

95%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

93%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

93%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

91%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

90%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

89%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

88%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

87%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The P102-100 uses modern memory architecture. The P102-100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID T4-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID T4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P102-100.

Insight	P102-100	GRID T4-1Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The P102-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $600 for the GRID T4-1Q, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 649.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	P102-100	GRID T4-1Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+649.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($80)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

P102-100 Benchmark Check

GRID T4-1Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of P102-100 and GRID T4-1Q

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

GRID T4-1Q

The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P102-100 scores 3,301 and the GRID T4-1Q reaches 3,303 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P102-100 is built on Pascal while the GRID T4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,200 (P102-100) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q). Raw compute: 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	P102-100	GRID T4-1Q
G3D Mark Score	3,301	3,303
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3200+56%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.77 TFLOPS+123%	4.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1683 MHz+43%	1178 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	200+56%	128
L1 Cache	1.2 MB+60%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+25%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P102-100	GRID T4-1Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2.5 MB (P102-100) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-1Q) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P102-100	GRID T4-1Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+25%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P102-100) vs 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	P102-100	GRID T4-1Q
DirectX	12_1	12_1
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P102-100 draws 250W versus the GRID T4-1Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID T4-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P102-100) vs 350W (GRID T4-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	P102-100	GRID T4-1Q
TDP	250W	225W-10%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	1mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	13.2	14.7+11%

💰

Value Analysis

The P102-100 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880 and now averages $600. The P102-100 costs 86.7% less ($520 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (P102-100) vs 5.5 (GRID T4-1Q) — the P102-100 offers 650.9% better value. The P102-100 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).