
P102-100 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

P102-100
Popular choices:

Iris Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The P102-100 is positioned at rank 201 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is on rank 282, so the P102-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P102-100
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the P102-100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | P102-100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The P102-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $100 for the Iris Xe Graphics G7, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 24.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P102-100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P102-100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7

P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The P102-100 scores 3,301 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P102-100 is built on Pascal while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 16 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 3,200 (P102-100) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | P102-100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,301 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 3200+3233% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P102-100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P102-100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 has 0 MB. The P102-100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | P102-100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P102-100) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P102-100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The P102-100 draws 250W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P102-100) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | P102-100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2 | 110.4+736% |
Value Analysis
The P102-100 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 and now averages $100. The P102-100 costs 20% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (P102-100) vs 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) — the P102-100 offers 24.8% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | P102-100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $200-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-20% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3+25% | 33.1 |
| Codename | GP102 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | February 12 2018 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #560 | #493 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















