P106-090 vs GeForce RTX 2060
P106-090
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The P106-090 is positioned at rank #184 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P106-090
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2060 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-090 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 472.3% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P106-090.
| Insight | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-472.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+472.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 43.1% better value per dollar than the P106-090.
| Insight | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+43.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P106-090 and GeForce RTX 2060
P106-090
The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the P106-090 scores 2,466 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 472.3%. The P106-090 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (P106-090) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,466 | 14,114+472% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1920+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.352 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+174% |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1680 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 48 | 120+150% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 1.9 MB+579% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P106-090 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (P106-090) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (P106-090) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-090 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-090) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 72.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-53% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-17% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9 | 88.2+168% |
Value Analysis
The P106-090 launched at $389 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The P106-090 costs 75% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.2 (P106-090) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 43.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $389 | $349-10% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-75% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.2 | 117.6+43% |
| Codename | GP106 | TU106 |
| Release | July 31 2017 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #639 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P106-090 and GeForce RTX 2060
