P106-090 vs Moore Threads MTT S80
P106-090
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The P106-090 is positioned at rank #184 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P106-090
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S80
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The P106-090 is significantly newer (2017 vs 0). The P106-090 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P106-090.
| Insight | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The P106-090 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $170 for the Moore Threads MTT S80, it costs 82% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 456.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+456.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P106-090 and Moore Threads MTT S80
P106-090
The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
Graphics Performance
The P106-090 scores 2,466 and the Moore Threads MTT S80 reaches 2,513 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-090 is built on Pascal while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (P106-090) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,466 | 2,513+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | MUSA |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 4096+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.352 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+527% |
| ROPs | 48 | 256+433% |
| TMUs | 48 | 256+433% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (P106-090) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Decoder: NVDEC vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-090 draws 75W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 109.1% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-090) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-71% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9+232% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The P106-090 launched at $389 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260 and now averages $170. The P106-090 costs 82.4% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.2 (P106-090) vs 14.8 (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the P106-090 offers 455.4% better value.
| Feature | P106-090 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $389 | $260-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-82% | $170 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.2+455% | 14.8 |
| Codename | GP106 | Chunxiao |
| Release | July 31 2017 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #639 | #635 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P106-090 and Moore Threads MTT S80
