P106-090 vs GeForce RTX 4070
P106-090
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The P106-090 is positioned at rank #184 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P106-090
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-090 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 991.6% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P106-090.
| Insight | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-991.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+991.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The P106-090 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 95% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 67.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P106-090 and GeForce RTX 4070
P106-090
The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the P106-090 scores 2,466 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 991.6%. The P106-090 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (P106-090) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,466 | 26,919+992% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5888+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.352 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+1139% |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 2475 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 184+283% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 5.8 MB+1971% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The P106-090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P106-090 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (P106-090) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (P106-090) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-090 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-090) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-25% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9 | 134.6+309% |
Value Analysis
The P106-090 launched at $389 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The P106-090 costs 94.5% less ($520 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.2 (P106-090) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the P106-090 offers 68.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | P106-090 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $389-35% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-95% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.2+68% | 48.9 |
| Codename | GP106 | AD104 |
| Release | July 31 2017 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #639 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P106-090 and GeForce RTX 4070
