P106-090 vs GRID M10-1Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The P106-090 is positioned at rank #184 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar P106-090

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

99%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

97%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

96%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

95%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

92%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

88%

#168

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2330%

#183

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

100%

#184

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

100%

#185

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#187

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

98%

#189

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

97%

#190

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

97%

#192

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

96%

#195

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

92%

#196

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The P106-090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-1Q.

Insight	P106-090	GRID M10-1Q
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	Standard Size (250mm)	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The P106-090 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P106-090 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $500), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1623.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	P106-090	GRID M10-1Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1623.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

P106-090 Benchmark Check

GRID M10-1Q Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of P106-090 and GRID M10-1Q

P106-090

The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.

GRID M10-1Q

The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P106-090 scores 2,466 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-090 is built on Pascal while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (P106-090) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	P106-090	GRID M10-1Q
G3D Mark Score	2,466+3%	2,385
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.352 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+105%
Boost Clock	1531 MHz+30%	1178 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	48	128+167%
L1 Cache	288 KB	768 KB+167%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P106-090	GRID M10-1Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (P106-090) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P106-090	GRID M10-1Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (P106-090) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	P106-090	GRID M10-1Q
DirectX	12	12_1
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-090 draws 75W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-090) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	P106-090	GRID M10-1Q
TDP	75W-67%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	250mm	267mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	32.9+210%	10.6

💰

Value Analysis

The P106-090 launched at $389 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID M10-1Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. The P106-090 costs 94% less ($470 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.2 (P106-090) vs 4.8 (GRID M10-1Q) — the P106-090 offers 1612.5% better value. The P106-090 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).