P106-090
Radeon RX 550X
P106-090 vs Radeon RX 550X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
P106-090 vs Radeon RX 550X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
P106-090 vs Radeon RX 550X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
P106-090
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌256.9% HIGHER MSRP$389 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($389 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Radeon RX 550X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 244.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅P106-090 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550X is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P106-090 vs Radeon RX 550X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
P106-090
The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.
Radeon RX 550X
The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.
Graphics Performance
The P106-090 scores 2,466 and the Radeon RX 550X reaches 2,381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-090 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (P106-090) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550X). Raw compute: 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | P106-090 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,466+4% | 2,381 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.352 TFLOPS+94% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz+29% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+125% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The P106-090 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | P106-090 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P106-090 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550X carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 550X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the P106-090 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (P106-090) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550X) — the P106-090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-090 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (P106-090) vs 12 (Radeon RX 550X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | P106-090 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090) vs UVD (Radeon RX 550X). Decoder: NVDEC vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X).
| Feature | P106-090 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | UVD |
| Decoder | NVDEC | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-090 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 550X's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 550X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-090) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 250mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | P106-090 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 250mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-29% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9 | 47.6+45% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the P106-090 came in at $389, while the Radeon RX 550X launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550X was 72% cheaper ($280 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (P106-090) vs 21.8 (Radeon RX 550X) — the Radeon RX 550X offers 246% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550X (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | P106-090 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $389 | $109-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 21.8+246% |
| Codename | GP106 | Lexa |
| Release | July 31 2017 | December 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #639 | #642 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P106-090 and Radeon RX 550X
