Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2200+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Pentium 4 1.80

1 Cores1 Thrd67 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Sempron 2200+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2001
Buy on Amazon

Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2200+ Performance Spectrum

Pentium 4 1.80
1 / 1
225
0.0%
brand logoAtom Z500
brand logoAtom Z515
brand logoXeon W-1350P
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoCore i9-14900KF
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
brand logoXeon w9-3595X
Sempron 2200+
1 / 1
265
+17.8%
brand logoAthlon XP 1600+
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoRyzen 7 4700GE
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2200+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Pentium 4 1.80
low6 FPS
medium6 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra6 FPS
1080P
Sempron 2200+
low7 FPS
medium7 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2200+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 4 1.80

2001

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Sempron 2200+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (225 vs 265).
    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $562 MSRP, while Sempron 2200+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Sempron 2200+

    2001

    Why buy it

    • ✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ✅Draws 62W instead of 67W, a 5W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron 2200+ better than Pentium 4 1.80?
    Yes. Sempron 2200+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 17.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Sempron 2200+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 2200+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron 2200+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 2200+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $562 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium 4 1.80 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (0.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 2200+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2200+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 1.80

    The Pentium 4 1.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 225 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 2200+

    The Sempron 2200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $30.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium 4 1.80 and Sempron 2200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Pentium 4 1.80 versus 1.5 GHz on the Sempron 2200+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 1.80. The Pentium 4 1.80 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (180 nm), while the Sempron 2200+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 4 1.80 scores 225 against the Sempron 2200+'s 265 — a 16.3% lead for the Sempron 2200+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeaturePentium 4 1.80Sempron 2200+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz+20%
    1.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    256 kB
    Process
    180 nm
    130 nm-28%
    Architecture
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    Barton (2001−2004)
    PassMark
    225
    265+18%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium 4 1.80 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 2200+ uses A (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium 4 1.80Sempron 2200+
    Socket
    PGA478
    A
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%