Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2400+

Intel

Pentium 4 1.80

1 Cores1 Thrd67 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
VS
AMD

Sempron 2400+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2001

Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2400+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2400+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2400+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 4 1.80

2001

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Sempron 2400+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (225 vs 262).
    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $562 MSRP, while Sempron 2400+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Sempron 2400+

    2001

    Why buy it

    • βœ…Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • βœ…Draws 62W instead of 67W, a 5W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron 2400+ better than Pentium 4 1.80?
    Yes. Sempron 2400+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 16.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Sempron 2400+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 2400+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 16.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron 2400+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 2400+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $562 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium 4 1.80 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (0.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 2400+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Pentium 4 1.80 vs Sempron 2400+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 1.80

    The Pentium 4 1.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000βˆ’2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 225 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 2400+

    The Sempron 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001βˆ’2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 262 points. Launch price was $27.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium 4 1.80 and Sempron 2400+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Pentium 4 1.80 versus 1.67 GHz on the Sempron 2400+ β€” a 7.5% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 1.80. The Pentium 4 1.80 uses the NetBurst (2000βˆ’2006) architecture (180 nm), while the Sempron 2400+ uses Barton (2001βˆ’2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 4 1.80 scores 225 against the Sempron 2400+'s 262 β€” a 15.2% lead for the Sempron 2400+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeaturePentium 4 1.80Sempron 2400+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz+8%
    1.67 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    256 kB
    Process
    180 nm
    130 nm-28%
    Architecture
    NetBurst (2000βˆ’2006)
    Barton (2001βˆ’2004)
    PassMark
    225
    262+16%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium 4 1.80 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 2400+ uses A (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium 4 1.80Sempron 2400+
    Socket
    PGA478
    A
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%