Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Pentium E5300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Pentium E5300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Pentium E5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 22.5 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).

Pentium E5300

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $72 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,395 vs 1,409).
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual Core SU4100 better than Pentium E5300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E5300 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core SU4100 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium Dual Core SU4100 comes in 116.1% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. Pentium E5300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 114.0% better value on paper (22.5 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Dual Core SU4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Pentium E5300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E5300

The Pentium E5300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Pentium E5300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium E5300 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E5300. The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium E5300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 scores 1,409 against the Pentium E5300's 1,395 — a 1% lead for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100.

Feature	Pentium Dual Core SU4100	Pentium E5300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2.6 GHz+100%
Base Clock	—	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB (total)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	NetBurst (2000−2006)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,409+1%	1,395

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium E5300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium Dual Core SU4100	Pentium E5300
Socket	BGA956	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 was priced at $134, while the Pentium E5300 came in at $62. On launch pricing ($134 vs $62), Pentium E5300 was $72 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 22.5 pts/$ for the Pentium E5300 — making the Pentium E5300 the 72.6% better value option.

Feature	Pentium Dual Core SU4100	Pentium E5300
MSRP	$134	$62-54%
Performance per Dollar	10.5	22.5+114%
Release Date	2009	2008

Search Pentium Dual Core SU4100 on Amazon

Search Pentium E5300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.