A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100

A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Performance Spectrum

A10 Micro-6700T

4 / 4

1,426

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

2 / 2

1,409

0.0%

Celeron B820

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 Micro-6700T

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Pentium Dual Core SU4100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌150% higher power demand at 5W vs 2W.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 5W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,409 vs 1,426).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while A10 Micro-6700T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 Micro-6700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 Micro-6700T better than Pentium Dual Core SU4100?

Yes. A10 Micro-6700T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10 Micro-6700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 Micro-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 Micro-6700T is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A10 Micro-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Dual Core SU4100 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 Micro-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 Micro-6700T vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 Micro-6700T

The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 Micro-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 — a 51.4% clock advantage for the A10 Micro-6700T. The A10 Micro-6700T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10 Micro-6700T scores 1,426 against the Pentium Dual Core SU4100's 1,409 — a 1.2% lead for the A10 Micro-6700T.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+69%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	—
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,426+1%	1,409
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 Micro-6700T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10 Micro-6700T	Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Socket	FT3	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core SU4100). The A10 Micro-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.