
Pentium Dual Core SU4100

Ryzen 7 5700X
Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,409 vs 26,609).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +601.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 746.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌123.1% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$134 MSRP
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Pentium Dual Core SU4100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100
The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 111.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X. The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 scores 1,409 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 179.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+254% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 1,409 | 26,609+1789% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium Dual Core SU4100) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 was priced at $134, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($134 vs $299), Pentium Dual Core SU4100 was $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 157.7% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134-55% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5 | 89.0+748% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














