Pentium E6300 vs Pentium N3510

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium E6300 vs Pentium N3510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium E6300 vs Pentium N3510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium E6300

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $77 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 90.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,032 vs 1,040).
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Pentium N3510

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3510 better than Pentium E6300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E6300 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3510 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3510 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium N3510 comes in 91.7% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Pentium E6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 90.2% better value on paper (12.3 vs 6.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium E6300 vs Pentium N3510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium E6300

The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium E6300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3510 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3510 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Pentium E6300 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium N3510 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium E6300 scores 1,032 against the Pentium N3510's 1,040 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium N3510. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium E6300 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3510.

Feature	Pentium E6300	Pentium N3510
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,032	1,040

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium E6300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium N3510 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium E6300	Pentium N3510
Socket	LGA775	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium E6300 was priced at $84, while the Pentium N3510 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($84 vs $161), Pentium E6300 was $77 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium E6300 delivers 12.3 pts/$ vs 6.5 pts/$ for the Pentium N3510 — making the Pentium E6300 the 62.2% better value option.

Feature	Pentium E6300	Pentium N3510
MSRP	$84-48%	$161
Performance per Dollar	12.3+89%	6.5
Release Date	2009	2013

Search Pentium E6300 on Amazon

Search Pentium N3510 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.