Pentium G3220 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

Pentium G3220 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 Performance Spectrum

Pentium G3220

2 / 2

1,885

0.0%

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

2 / 2

1,886

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G3220 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G3220 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G3220

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,885 vs 1,886).
❌Launch MSRP is still $54 MSRP, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2600% higher power demand at 54W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 54W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G3220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3220 better than Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G3220 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G3220 is the better buy right now. Pentium G3220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $54 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium G3220 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G3220

The Pentium G3220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,885 points. Launch price was $71.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium G3220 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Pentium G3220 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Pentium G3220. The Pentium G3220 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G3220 scores 1,885 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84's 1,886 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3220 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84.

Feature	Pentium G3220	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+30%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,885	1,886

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G3220 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium G3220	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Socket	LGA1150	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Pentium G3220) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84). The Pentium G3220 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3220 targets Desktop.