
Pentium G4560
Popular choices:

Phenom II X6 1075T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Pentium G4560
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 286.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.3 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 125W, a 74W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Phenom II X6 1075T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1075T across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.
Phenom II X6 1075T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G4560.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,500 vs 3,536).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 55.3 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌145.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 51W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G4560
2017Phenom II X6 1075T
2010Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 286.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.3 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 125W, a 74W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Phenom II X6 1075T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G4560.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1075T across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,500 vs 3,536).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 55.3 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌145.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 51W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G4560 better than Phenom II X6 1075T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Pentium G4560 | Phenom II X6 1075T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Pentium G4560 | Phenom II X6 1075T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Pentium G4560 | Phenom II X6 1075T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Pentium G4560 | Phenom II X6 1075T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G4560 and Phenom II X6 1075T

Pentium G4560
Pentium G4560
The Pentium G4560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,536 points. Launch price was $108.

Phenom II X6 1075T
Phenom II X6 1075T
The Phenom II X6 1075T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $260.
Processing Power
The Pentium G4560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1075T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1075T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G4560 versus 3.5 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1075T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Pentium G4560 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1075T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G4560 scores 3,536 against the Phenom II X6 1075T's 3,500 — a 1% lead for the Pentium G4560. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4560 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1075T.
| Feature | Pentium G4560 | Phenom II X6 1075T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 3,536+1% | 3,500 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,896 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 679 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,960 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium G4560 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1075T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Pentium G4560 versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X6 1075T — the Pentium G4560 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4560 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Pentium G4560 | Phenom II X6 1075T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X6 1075T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Pentium G4560) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1075T). The Pentium G4560 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Phenom II X6 1075T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4560 targets Desktop, Phenom II X6 1075T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Phenom II X6 1075T rivals Core i5-750.
| Feature | Pentium G4560 | Phenom II X6 1075T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Pentium G4560 launched at $64 MSRP, while the Phenom II X6 1075T debuted at $245. On MSRP ($64 vs $245), the Pentium G4560 is $181 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G4560 delivers 55.3 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Phenom II X6 1075T — making the Pentium G4560 the 117.8% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium G4560 | Phenom II X6 1075T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $64-74% | $245 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.3+287% | 14.3 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













