Pentium M 1.40 vs Core Solo T1200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 1.40 is positioned at rank 271 and the Core Solo T1200 is on rank 1241, so the Pentium M 1.40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.40

#256

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

425%

#257

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

419%

#258

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

385%

#259

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

383%

#260

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

379%

#262

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

366%

#263

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

351%

#264

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

351%

#265

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

341%

#271

Pentium M 1.40

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#274

Core 2 Extreme X9100

MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1200

#1229

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

17259%

#1230

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

17006%

#1231

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

15612%

#1232

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

15541%

#1233

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

15399%

#1235

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

14871%

#1236

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

14259%

#1237

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

14235%

#1238

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

13853%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Solo T1200 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 1.40 in both compute-intensive tasks (2.9% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Pentium M 1.40	Core Solo T1200
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Pentium M 1.40	Core Solo T1200
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Pentium M 1.40 Benchmark Check

Core Solo T1200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 1.40 and Core Solo T1200

Pentium M 1.40

The Pentium M 1.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

Core Solo T1200

The Core Solo T1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 355 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.40 and Core Solo T1200 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Pentium M 1.40 versus 1.5 GHz on the Core Solo T1200 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1200. The Pentium M 1.40 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Core Solo T1200 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.40 scores 345 against the Core Solo T1200's 355 — a 2.9% lead for the Core Solo T1200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 1.40	Core Solo T1200
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.5 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Banias (2003)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	345	355+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 1.40 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core Solo T1200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.