
Pentium M 1.40 vs Athlon 64 2000+

Pentium M 1.40

Athlon 64 2000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 1.40 is positioned at rank 271 and the Athlon 64 2000+ is on rank 1088, so the Pentium M 1.40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.40
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium M 1.40 | Athlon 64 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium M 1.40 | Athlon 64 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 1.40 and Athlon 64 2000+

Pentium M 1.40
The Pentium M 1.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon 64 2000+
The Athlon 64 2000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium M 1.40 and Athlon 64 2000+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Pentium M 1.40 versus 1 GHz on the Athlon 64 2000+ — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium M 1.40. The Pentium M 1.40 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon 64 2000+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.40 scores 345 against the Athlon 64 2000+'s 330 — a 4.4% lead for the Pentium M 1.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Pentium M 1.40 | Athlon 64 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz+40% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Banias (2003) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 345+5% | 330 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium M 1.40 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 2000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium M 1.40 | Athlon 64 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












