Pentium M 1.40
VS
E-240

Pentium M 1.40 vs E-240

Intel

Pentium M 1.40

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2003
VS
AMD

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 1.40 is positioned at rank 271 and the E-240 is on rank 1169, so the Pentium M 1.40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.40

#256
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
425%
#257
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
419%
#258
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
385%
#259
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
383%
#260
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
379%
#262
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
366%
#263
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
351%
#264
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
351%
#265
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
341%
#271
Pentium M 1.40
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#274
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E-240

#1157
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4340%
#1158
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4277%
#1159
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3926%
#1160
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3908%
#1161
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3872%
#1163
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3740%
#1164
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3586%
#1165
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3580%
#1166
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3484%
#1169
E-240
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E-240 (2011) utilizes 40 nm technology and **DDR3 Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium M 1.40E-240
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium M 1.40 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium M 1.40E-240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 1.40 and E-240

Intel

Pentium M 1.40

The Pentium M 1.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.40 and E-240 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Pentium M 1.40 versus 1.5 GHz on the E-240 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the E-240. The Pentium M 1.40 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the E-240 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.40 scores 345 against the E-240's 338 — a 2% lead for the Pentium M 1.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 1.40E-240
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
1.5 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
130 nm
40 nm-69%
Architecture
Banias (2003)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
345+2%
338
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 1.40 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E-240 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium M 1.40E-240
Socket
PGA478
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%