Pentium M 730
VS
Sempron 3400+

Pentium M 730 vs Sempron 3400+

Intel

Pentium M 730

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Sempron 3400+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 730 is positioned at rank 161 and the Sempron 3400+ is on rank 907, so the Pentium M 730 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 730

#147
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
337%
#148
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
332%
#149
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
305%
#150
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
304%
#151
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
301%
#153
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
291%
#154
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
279%
#155
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
278%
#156
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
271%
#161
Pentium M 730
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#171
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#174
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3400+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21602%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20412%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14821%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4465%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3537%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3094%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1772%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1749%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1592%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1592%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1574%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1532%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1511%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1504%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1491%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#906
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
100%
#907
Sempron 3400+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#908
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
100%
#909
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#910
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
99%
#911
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
98%
#912
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
98%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
98%
#914
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#915
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
98%
#916
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
98%
#918
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
97%
#919
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
97%
#920
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
97%
#921
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 3400+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 730 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 730Sempron 3400+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 730Sempron 3400+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 730 and Sempron 3400+

Intel

Pentium M 730

The Pentium M 730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Sempron 3400+

The Sempron 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 433 points. Launch price was $30.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 730 and Sempron 3400+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 730 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3400+ — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Sempron 3400+. The Pentium M 730 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Sempron 3400+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 730 scores 435 against the Sempron 3400+'s 433 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium M 730. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 730Sempron 3400+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2 GHz+25%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+1500%
128 kB
Process
90 nm
90 nm
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
435
433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 730 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3400+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium M 730Sempron 3400+
Socket
PGA478
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%