Pentium M 730 vs Turion 64 MT-28

Pentium M 730 vs Turion 64 MT-28 Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 730

1 / 1

435

0.0%

445

+2.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 730 vs Turion 64 MT-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 730 vs Turion 64 MT-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 730

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 27W instead of 512W, a 485W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (435 vs 445).

Turion 64 MT-28

2005

Why buy it

✅+2.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1796.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 27W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 MT-28 better than Pentium M 730?

Yes. Turion 64 MT-28 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2.3% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-28 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 MT-28 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 MT-28 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.3% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 MT-28 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 730 vs Turion 64 MT-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 730

The Pentium M 730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 MT-28

The Turion 64 MT-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 730 and Turion 64 MT-28 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 730 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-28 — identical boost frequencies. The Pentium M 730 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 730 scores 435 against the Turion 64 MT-28's 445 — a 2.3% lead for the Turion 64 MT-28. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 730	Turion 64 MT-28
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	435	445+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 730 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.