Pentium M 750 vs Pentium M 760

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 750 vs Pentium M 760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 750 vs Pentium M 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 750

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium M 760 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (485 vs 515).

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 760 better than Pentium M 750?

Yes. Pentium M 760 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 760 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 760 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 760 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 760 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 750 vs Pentium M 760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 750

The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 750 and Pentium M 760 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Pentium M 760 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture using a 90 nm process. In PassMark, the Pentium M 750 scores 485 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 6% lead for the Pentium M 760. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 750	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2 GHz+8%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	2 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	485	515+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	240