Pentium P6200 vs Xeon E5-2403

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium P6200 vs Xeon E5-2403 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium P6200 vs Xeon E5-2403: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium P6200

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Xeon E5-2403 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2403, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2403 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2403

2012

Why buy it

✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,367 vs 2,394).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium P6200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium P6200 better than Xeon E5-2403?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2403 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium P6200 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium P6200 is the better buy right now. Pentium P6200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2403 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2403 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and 233.3% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium P6200 vs Xeon E5-2403 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

Xeon E5-2403

The Xeon E5-2403 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $230.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium P6200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5-2403 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2403 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 — a 173.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2403 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Pentium P6200 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2403 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6200 scores 2,394 against the Xeon E5-2403's 2,367 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium P6200. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2403.

Feature	Pentium P6200	Xeon E5-2403
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	1.8 GHz+1285%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz+18%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	10240 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	2,394+1%	2,367
Geekbench 6 Single	200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	400	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium P6200 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2403 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium P6200	Xeon E5-2403
Socket	PGA988	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Pentium P6200) / not specified (Xeon E5-2403). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2403 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.