Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V2A46 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,965 vs 4,999).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2A46 better than Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)?

Yes. Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 23.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 23.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Embedded V2A46 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2010), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,965 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,999 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded V2A46's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) scores 4,965 against the Ryzen Embedded V2A46's 4,999 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2A46. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46.

Feature	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	7 nm-84%
Architecture	Thuban (2010)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	4,965	4,999

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.