Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Xeon X5672

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Xeon X5672 Performance Spectrum

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

6 / 6

4,965

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X5672

4 / 8

5,036

+1.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Xeon X5672 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Xeon X5672: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5672 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,965 vs 5,036).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5672, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X5672

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5672 better than Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5672 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5672 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5672 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5672 is the better buy right now. Xeon X5672 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon X5672 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010), 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Xeon X5672 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,965 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5672

The Xeon X5672 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,036 points. Launch price was $115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon X5672 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X5672 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5672 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon X5672 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) scores 4,965 against the Xeon X5672's 5,036 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon X5672. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5672.

Feature	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)	Xeon X5672
Cores / Threads	6 / 6+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Thuban (2010)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	4,965	5,036+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5672 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)	Xeon X5672
Socket	AM3	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5672). Primary use case: Xeon X5672 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5672 rivals Core i7-980X.