CPU
GPU
FirePro 3D V8750
Popular choices:
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V8750 is positioned at rank 370 and the Radeon 2100 is on rank 725, so the FirePro 3D V8750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 2100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V8750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V8750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2020% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2020%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2020%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V8750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $500 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 107.8% better value per dollar than the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+107.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8750 and Radeon 2100
FirePro 3D V8750
The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V8750 scores 1,272 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the FirePro 3D V8750 leads by 2020%. The FirePro 3D V8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,272+2020% | 60 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+343% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+433% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V8750 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V8750 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the FirePro 3D V8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 3.2+60% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: UVD 2 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8750 draws 274W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 138.3% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 50W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6+283% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $49. The Radeon 2100 costs 90.2% less ($451 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.5 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 1.2 (Radeon 2100) — the FirePro 3D V8750 offers 108.3% better value. The Radeon 2100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1799 | $149-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $49-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5+108% | 1.2 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #423 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V8750 and Radeon 2100
