PRO A10-8770E vs Ryzen 9 5900X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

PRO A10-8770E vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

PRO A10-8770E vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

PRO A10-8770E

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($395 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,001 vs 38,955).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +311.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 833.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
39% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$395 MSRP
❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than PRO A10-8770E?

Yes. Ryzen 9 5900X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 311.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1198.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 311.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1198.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in 39.0% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $395 MSRP, and it still gives you a 311.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 833.9% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5900X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

PRO A10-8770E vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A10-8770E

The PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The PRO A10-8770E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-8770E versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The PRO A10-8770E uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A10-8770E scores 3,001 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 171.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	PRO A10-8770E	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.8 GHz+37%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.7 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	—	64 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512K (per core)
Process	28 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-75%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	3,001	38,955+1198%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,888

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	PRO A10-8770E	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	AM4	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (PRO A10-8770E) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	PRO A10-8770E	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the PRO A10-8770E was priced at $395, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($395 vs $549), PRO A10-8770E was $154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the PRO A10-8770E delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 161.3% better value option.

Feature	PRO A10-8770E	Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP	$395-28%	$549
Performance per Dollar	7.6	71.0+834%
Release Date	2016	2020

Search PRO A10-8770E on Amazon

Search Ryzen 9 5900X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.