PRO A12-9800 vs Ryzen 3 3200U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

PRO A12-9800 vs Ryzen 3 3200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

PRO A12-9800 vs Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

PRO A12-9800

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $110 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 3200U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 3200U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A12-9800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,730 vs 3,751).

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A12-9800 better than Ryzen 3 3200U?

Yes. PRO A12-9800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A12-9800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A12-9800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A12-9800 is the better buy right now. PRO A12-9800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $110 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

PRO A12-9800 vs Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A12-9800

The PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,751 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 3 3200U

The Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,730 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The PRO A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 3 3200U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-9800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-9800 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200U — a 18.2% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The PRO A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A12-9800 scores 3,751 against the Ryzen 3 3200U's 3,730 — a 0.6% lead for the PRO A12-9800.

Feature	PRO A12-9800	Ryzen 3 3200U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+20%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+46%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512K (per core)
Process	28 nm	12 nm-57%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Picasso-U (Zen) (2019)
PassMark	3,751	3,730

🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.