PRO A12-9800
Xeon L5506
PRO A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
PRO A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
PRO A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
PRO A12-9800
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $110 MSRP, while Xeon L5506 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon L5506
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 65W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A12-9800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,706 vs 3,751).
Quick Answers
So, is PRO A12-9800 better than Xeon L5506?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
PRO A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
PRO A12-9800
The PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,751 points. Launch price was $69.
Xeon L5506
The Xeon L5506 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,706 points. Launch price was $125.
Processing Power
Both the PRO A12-9800 and Xeon L5506 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-9800 versus 0.13 GHz on the Xeon L5506 — a 188% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The PRO A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon L5506 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A12-9800 scores 3,751 against the Xeon L5506's 3,706 — a 1.2% lead for the PRO A12-9800.
| Feature | PRO A12-9800 | Xeon L5506 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+3131% | 0.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+78% | 2.13 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Gainestown (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,751+1% | 3,706 |
Memory & Platform
The PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5506 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | PRO A12-9800 | Xeon L5506 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on PRO A12-9800 and Xeon L5506
