PRO A12-9800E vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

PRO A12-9800E vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

PRO A12-9800E vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

PRO A12-9800E

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,128 vs 3,142).
❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A12-9800E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while PRO A12-9800E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R1305G better than PRO A12-9800E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A12-9800E is ahead with a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1305G pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R1305G comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that PRO A12-9800E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

PRO A12-9800E vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A12-9800E

The PRO A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The PRO A12-9800E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-9800E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the PRO A12-9800E versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 30.3% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The PRO A12-9800E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A12-9800E scores 3,128 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

Feature	PRO A12-9800E	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+107%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,128	3,142

🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A12-9800E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.