PRO A12-9800E vs Xeon Gold 6262V

PRO A12-9800E vs Xeon Gold 6262V Performance Spectrum

PRO A12-9800E

4 / 4

3,128

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon Gold 6262V

24 / 48

3,155

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

PRO A12-9800E vs Xeon Gold 6262V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

PRO A12-9800E vs Xeon Gold 6262V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

PRO A12-9800E

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6262V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,128 vs 3,155).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6262V, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.

Xeon Gold 6262V

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6262V better than PRO A12-9800E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6262V makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while PRO A12-9800E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6262V is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6262V is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6262V still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6262V comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6262V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

PRO A12-9800E vs Xeon Gold 6262V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A12-9800E

The PRO A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Gold 6262V

The Xeon Gold 6262V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,155 points. Launch price was $2,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The PRO A12-9800E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6262V offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262V has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the PRO A12-9800E versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262V — a 5.4% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The PRO A12-9800E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A12-9800E scores 3,128 against the Xeon Gold 6262V's 3,155 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6262V.

Feature	PRO A12-9800E	Xeon Gold 6262V
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	24 / 48+500%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+6%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+63%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	33 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	24 MB+1100%
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	3,128	3,155

🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A12-9800E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.