Quadro 2100M vs Radeon R7 M460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon R7 M460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon R7 M460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2100M

2013

Why buy it

✅10.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M460

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 2100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 2100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (1,100 vs 1,069), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2100M vs Radeon R7 M460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2100M

The Quadro 2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Radeon R7 M460

The Radeon R7 M460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,069 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2100M scores 1,100 and the Radeon R7 M460 reaches 1,069 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M460 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro 2100M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M460). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro 2100M) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M460).

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R7 M460
G3D Mark Score	1,100+3%	1,069
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	576+50%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7684 TFLOPS	0.864 TFLOPS+12%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	48+100%	24
L1 Cache	48 KB	96 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R7 M460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M460 carries 512 MB. Quadro 2100M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2100M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M460. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2100M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M460) — the Quadro 2100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R7 M460
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2100M draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 M460's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro 2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2100M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R7 M460
TDP	55W-27%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	20.0+40%	14.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M460 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro 2100M	Radeon R7 M460
MSRP	—	$250
Codename	GK106	Meso
Release	July 23 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#788	#861

Search Quadro 2100M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.