Quadro 4000M vs HD Graphics P630

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro 4000M

100

1,287

+0.5%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

HD Graphics P630

15

1,280

0.0%

Arc Graphics 130T

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 4000M is positioned at rank #91 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000M

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

95%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

93%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

92%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

90%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

89%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

87%

#76

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

918%

#91

Quadro 4000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

95%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

92%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

91%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 4000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics P630.

Insight	Quadro 4000M	HD Graphics P630
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 4000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 4000M Benchmark Check

HD Graphics P630 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000M and HD Graphics P630

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

HD Graphics P630

The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the HD Graphics P630 reaches 1,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the HD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 192 (HD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	HD Graphics P630
G3D Mark Score	1,287	1,280
Architecture	Fermi	Generation 9.5
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm++
Shading Units	336+75%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6384 TFLOPS+51%	0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+967%	3
TMUs	56+133%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000M	HD Graphics P630
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics P630 has 0 MB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro 4000M	HD Graphics P630
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the HD Graphics P630's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 1W (HD Graphics P630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.