Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6670/7670

NVIDIA

Quadro CX

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6670/7670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

  • 50.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1919.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1917.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro CX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro CX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (947 vs 946), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro CX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6670/7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,900 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1917.1% (9.6 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro CX has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

AMD

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro CX scores 947 and the Radeon HD 6670/7670 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro CX is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro CX) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670).

FeatureQuadro CXRadeon HD 6670/7670
G3D Mark Score
947
946
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
480+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4623 TFLOPS
0.576 TFLOPS+25%
ROPs
24+200%
8
TMUs
64+167%
24
L2 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro CXRadeon HD 6670/7670
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro CX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 carries 512 MB. Quadro CX gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro CX and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670/7670. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro CX) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro CXRadeon HD 6670/7670
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro CX draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6670/7670's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro CX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro CXRadeon HD 6670/7670
TDP
150W
45W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
6.3
21.0+233%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro CX came in at $1999, while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6670/7670 was 95% cheaper ($1900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (Quadro CX) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers 1820% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6670/7670 (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro CXRadeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP
$1999
$99-95%
Performance per Dollar
0.5
9.6+1820%
Codename
GT200B
Turks
Release
November 11 2008
January 5 2012
Ranking
#901
#870

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.