Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 8690M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 8690M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 8690M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅45.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Radeon HD 8690M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro CX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro CX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8690M instead at 984 vs 947, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro CX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro CX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 8690M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon HD 8690M

The Radeon HD 8690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 984 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro CX scores 947 and the Radeon HD 8690M reaches 984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro CX is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8690M uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro CX) vs 320 (Radeon HD 8690M). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX) vs 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690M).

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 8690M
G3D Mark Score	947	984+4%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	320+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.528 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs	24+200%	8
TMUs	64+220%	20
L2 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 8690M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro CX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8690M carries 512 MB. Quadro CX gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro CX and System on the Radeon HD 8690M. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro CX) vs 128 KB (Radeon HD 8690M) — the Quadro CX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 8690M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX) vs 12 (Radeon HD 8690M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 8690M
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12+8%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro CX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8690M). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 3.

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 8690M
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD	UVD 3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro CX draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 8690M's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 8690M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro CX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8690M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 8690M
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	267mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	6.3	19.7+213%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8690M (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 8690M
MSRP	$1999	—
Codename	GT200B	Sun
Release	November 11 2008	March 1 2013
Ranking	#901	#891

Search Quadro CX on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8690M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.