Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6750M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6750M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6750M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅46.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.

Radeon HD 6750M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro CX across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro CX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.6% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (947 vs 937), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro CX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro CX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6750M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon HD 6750M

The Radeon HD 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 937 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro CX scores 947 and the Radeon HD 6750M reaches 937 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro CX is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6750M uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro CX) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6750M). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750M).

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 6750M
G3D Mark Score	947+1%	937
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	480+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS+25%
ROPs	24+200%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 6750M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro CX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750M carries 1 GB. Quadro CX gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro CX and System on the Radeon HD 6750M. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro CX) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750M) — the Radeon HD 6750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 6750M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro CX draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6750M's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro CX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 6750M
TDP	150W	35W-77%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	6.3	26.8+325%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6750M (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon HD 6750M
MSRP	$1999	—
Codename	GT200B	Whistler
Release	November 11 2008	January 4 2011
Ranking	#901	#905

Search Quadro CX on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6750M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.