G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro CX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro CX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 1010

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,929 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2831.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Quadro CX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 1010 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 147mm instead of 267mm, a 120mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro CX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅33.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2755.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
❌81.6% longer card at 267mm vs 147mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro CX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 33.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 1010 instead at 972 vs 947, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 1010 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 1010 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,929 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2831.1% (13.9 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro CX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 1010 vs Quadro CX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 1010

The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Quadro CX reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Quadro CX
G3D Mark Score	972+3%	947
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	256+33%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7516 TFLOPS+63%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	16	64+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 1010 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro CX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Quadro CX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 1010 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX carries 4 GB. Quadro CX gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1010 and 64-bit on the Quadro CX. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 1010) vs 192 KB (Quadro CX) — the GeForce GT 1010 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Quadro CX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Quadro CX
DirectX	12 (12_1)+8%	11.1 (10_0)
Vulkan	1.4	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 1010) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Quadro CX
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	VP8 (Feature Set H)	PureVideo HD
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 1010 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 147mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Quadro CX
TDP	30W-80%	150W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	147mm	267mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80
Perf/Watt	32.4+414%	6.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 1010 came in at $70, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce GT 1010 was 96.5% cheaper ($1929 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GeForce GT 1010 offers 2680% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 1010 (2021 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 1010	Quadro CX
MSRP	$70-96%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	13.9+2680%	0.5
Codename	GP108	GT200B
Release	January 13 2021	November 11 2008
Ranking	#895	#901

Search GeForce GT 1010 on Amazon

Search Quadro CX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.