Quadro CX vs Radeon R5 340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro CX vs Radeon R5 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro CX vs Radeon R5 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅3.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1919.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 340

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1893.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro CX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro CX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (947 vs 935), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro CX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,900 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1893.6% (9.4 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro CX has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro CX vs Radeon R5 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon R5 340

The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro CX scores 947 and the Radeon R5 340 reaches 935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro CX is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 340 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro CX) vs 384 (Radeon R5 340). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340).

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon R5 340
G3D Mark Score	947+1%	935
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.9085 TFLOPS+97%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64+167%	24
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon R5 340
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro CX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 340 carries 512 MB. Quadro CX gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro CX and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 340. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro CX) vs 512 KB (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon R5 340
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro CX draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 340's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R5 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro CX) vs 300W (Radeon R5 340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon R5 340
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	6.3	18.7+197%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro CX came in at $1999, while the Radeon R5 340 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R5 340 was 95% cheaper ($1900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (Quadro CX) vs 9.4 (Radeon R5 340) — the Radeon R5 340 offers 1780% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 340 (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro CX	Radeon R5 340
MSRP	$1999	$99-95%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	9.4+1780%
Codename	GT200B	Lexa
Release	November 11 2008	April 20 2017
Ranking	#901	#773

Search Quadro CX on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.