Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Quadro CX
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro CX is positioned at rank 383 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is on rank 180, so the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro CX
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is significantly newer (2025 vs 2008). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro CX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro CX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E.
| Insight | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $85 versus $500 for the Quadro CX, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 472.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+472.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($85) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro CX and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro CX scores 947 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro CX is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro CX) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 947+3% | 921 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+10248% |
| ROPs | 24 | 128+433% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 8 MB+4111% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro CX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has 512 MB. The Quadro CX offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 8 MB+4111% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro CX draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro CX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.3+103% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro CX launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139 and now averages $85. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E costs 83% less ($415 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.9 (Quadro CX) vs 10.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers 468.4% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $139-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $85-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 10.8+468% |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 48 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #901 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro CX and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
