Quadro CX
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro CX
2008Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1338.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
2025Why buy it
- ✅51.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,860 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1298.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro CX scores 947 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro CX is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro CX) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 947+3% | 921 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+10248% |
| ROPs | 24 | 128+433% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 8 MB+4111% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro CX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. Quadro CX gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro CX and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 8 MB+4111% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro CX draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro CX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.3+103% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro CX came in at $1999, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 93% cheaper ($1860 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (Quadro CX) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers 1220% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro CX | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $139-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 6.6+1220% |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 48 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #901 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro CX and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
