Quadro FX 1000 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1000 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1000 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1000

2008

Why buy it

✅+17.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Radeon 9550 / X1050

2019

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Quadro FX 1000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 9550 / X1050 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (29 vs 34).
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 17.2% in PassMark G3D (34 vs 29), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 9550 / X1050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 9550 / X1050 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1000 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1000

The Quadro FX 1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon 9550 / X1050

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1000 scores 34 versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 29 — the Quadro FX 1000 leads by 17.2%. The Quadro FX 1000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1000) vs 512 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1000) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 9550 / X1050).

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	Radeon 9550 / X1050
G3D Mark Score	34+17%	29
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	240	512+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+100%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	Radeon 9550 / X1050
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 carries 512 MB. Radeon 9550 / X1050 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1000 and 64-bit on the Radeon 9550 / X1050. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1000) vs 512 KB (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	Radeon 9550 / X1050
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1000 draws 189W versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1000) vs 350W (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	Radeon 9550 / X1050
TDP	189W	50W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	165mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.6+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1000 came in at $500, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon 9550 / X1050 was 100+% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 1000) vs Infinity (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 9550 / X1050 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	Radeon 9550 / X1050
MSRP	$500	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	Infinity
Codename	GT200B	Lexa
Release	November 11 2008	March 27 2019
Ranking	#815	#772

Search Quadro FX 1000 on Amazon

Search Radeon 9550 / X1050 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.