Quadro FX 2700M vs Radeon 3015e

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 2700M vs Radeon 3015e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 2700M vs Radeon 3015e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 2700M

2008

Why buy it

✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Radeon 3015e

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro FX 2700M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3015e is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 2700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 2700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.6% in PassMark G3D (367 vs 351), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 3015e is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 3015e makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 2700M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 2700M vs Radeon 3015e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 2700M

The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon 3015e

The Radeon 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 351 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 2700M scores 367 and the Radeon 3015e reaches 351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 3015e uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 512 (Radeon 3015e). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3015e).

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon 3015e
G3D Mark Score	367+5%	351
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	240	512+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+100%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon 3015e
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2700M and 64-bit on the Radeon 3015e. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3015e) — the Radeon 3015e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon 3015e
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2700M draws 189W versus the Radeon 3015e's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon 3015e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2700M) vs 350W (Radeon 3015e). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon 3015e
TDP	189W	50W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	1.9	7.0+268%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 3015e (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 2700M	Radeon 3015e
MSRP	—	$49
Codename	GT200B	Polaris 23
Release	November 11 2008	May 13 2019
Ranking	#815	#757

Search Quadro FX 2700M on Amazon

Search Radeon 3015e on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.