Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon HD 6550D

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2800M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6550D

2010Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon HD 6550D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon HD 6550D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon HD 6550D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 2800M

2008

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6550D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6550D

2010

Why buy it

  • 10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6550D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 2800M instead at 415 vs 400, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 2800M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6550D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6550D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 2800M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon HD 6550D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2800M

The Quadro FX 2800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 415 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 6550D

The Radeon HD 6550D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 400 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 2800M scores 415 and the Radeon HD 6550D reaches 400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6550D uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6550D). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550D).

FeatureQuadro FX 2800MRadeon HD 6550D
G3D Mark Score
415+4%
400
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
1408+487%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS+262%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
88+10%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 2800MRadeon HD 6550D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 2800M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6550D carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 2800M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2800M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6550D. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6550D) — the Radeon HD 6550D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 2800MRadeon HD 6550D
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2800M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6550D's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 2800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 2800MRadeon HD 6550D
TDP
189W-6%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
2.2+10%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6550D (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 2800MRadeon HD 6550D
MSRP
$70
Codename
GT200B
Cayman
Release
November 11 2008
December 14 2010
Ranking
#815
#623

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.