Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon R5 220

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon R5 220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3450

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 189W instead of 275W, a 86W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
240% HIGHER MSRP
$119 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 220

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
✅Delivers 235.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌45.5% higher power demand at 275W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3450 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (149 vs 147), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3450 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 220 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $84 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 235.4% (4.2 vs 1.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 220 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3450 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3450

The Quadro FX 3450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 149 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R5 220

The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3450 scores 149 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3450 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3450) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3450) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).

Feature	Quadro FX 3450	Radeon R5 220
G3D Mark Score	149+1%	147
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	2560+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	4.849 TFLOPS+679%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3450	Radeon R5 220
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3450 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 220 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3450 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3450) vs 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3450	Radeon R5 220
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	1 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3450 draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 37.1% difference. The Quadro FX 3450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3450) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 3450	Radeon R5 220
TDP	189W-31%	275W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.8+60%	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3450 came in at $119, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 220 was 70.6% cheaper ($84 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (Quadro FX 3450) vs 4.2 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 223.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 220 (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3450	Radeon R5 220
MSRP	$119	$35-71%
Performance per Dollar	1.3	4.2+223%
Codename	GT200B	Hawaii
Release	November 11 2008	November 5 2013
Ranking	#815	#316

Search Quadro FX 3450 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 220 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.