Quadro FX 3450
VS
Radeon R5 220

Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon R5 220

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3450

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 220

2013Core: 947 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3450 is positioned at rank 337 and the Radeon R5 220 is on rank 252, so the Radeon R5 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3450

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
84%
#322
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11818%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
100%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
99%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
98%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
94%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
92%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
86%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
86%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
85%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
83%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
82%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
82%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
78%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
78%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 220

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1727%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1659%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1640%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1637%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1634%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1625%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1604%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1598%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1583%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1579%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1560%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1557%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1529%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1528%
#236
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1905%
#252
Radeon R5 220
MSRP: $35|Avg: $15
100%
#253
Radeon HD 7350
MSRP: $40|Avg: $10
98%
#254
GeForce GTX 285
MSRP: $359|Avg: $30
98%
#255
Radeon HD 7570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#256
Radeon HD 6380G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#257
Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
95%
#258
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#259
GeForce GT 330
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
95%
#261
Radeon HD 7340G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#262
Radeon HD 8210E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#263
Radeon 535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
92%
#265
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
MSRP: $85|Avg: $15
91%
#266
GeForce GT 130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 220 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 3450Radeon R5 220
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R5 220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 97.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 3450Radeon R5 220
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+97.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3450 and Radeon R5 220

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3450

The Quadro FX 3450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 149 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon R5 220

The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3450 scores 149 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3450 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3450) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3450) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).

FeatureQuadro FX 3450Radeon R5 220
G3D Mark Score
149+1%
147
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
2560+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS+679%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
160+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3450Radeon R5 220
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3450 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 has 1 GB. The Radeon R5 220 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3450) vs 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3450Radeon R5 220
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
1 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3450 draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 37.1% difference. The Quadro FX 3450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3450) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 3450Radeon R5 220
TDP
189W-31%
275W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.8+60%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 3450 launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35 and now averages $15. The Radeon R5 220 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.0 (Quadro FX 3450) vs 9.8 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 96% better value. The Radeon R5 220 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3450Radeon R5 220
MSRP
$119
$35-71%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$15-50%
Performance per Dollar
5.0
9.8+96%
Codename
GT200B
Hawaii
Release
November 11 2008
November 5 2013
Ranking
#815
#316