Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6300 across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 2565% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,599 MSRPvs$60 MSRP

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

  • 907.3% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,539 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 53391.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 907.3% in average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1907.2% in PassMark G3D (5,319 vs 265), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Quadro FX 3500 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 55nm, and 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,539 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 53391.1% (88.7 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3500 scores 265 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the Radeon RX 6300 leads by 1907.2%. The Quadro FX 3500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300).

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score
265
5,319+1907%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
240
768+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS+493%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+67%
48
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro FX 3500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 6300 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3500) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
4 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit+100%
32-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500 draws 189W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 137.5% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon RX 6300
TDP
189W
35W-81%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
1.4
152.0+10757%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3500 came in at $1599, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 96.2% cheaper ($1539 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 44250% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon RX 6300
MSRP
$1599
$60-96%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
88.7+44250%
Codename
GT200B
Navi 24
Release
November 11 2008
January 4 2022
Ranking
#815
#379

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.