Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon HD 7640G

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3600M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7640G

2012Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon HD 7640G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon HD 7640G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon HD 7640G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3600M

2008

Why buy it

  • 57.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 320% higher power demand at 189W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 7640G

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 189W, a 144W reduction.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (467 vs 454), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7640G makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7640G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3600M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3600M vs Radeon HD 7640G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3600M

The Quadro FX 3600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 467 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 7640G

The Radeon HD 7640G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 454 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3600M scores 467 and the Radeon HD 7640G reaches 454 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7640G uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7640G). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7640G).

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 7640G
G3D Mark Score
467+3%
454
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
480+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS+8%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 7640G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3600M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7640G.

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 7640G
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 11 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7640G). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 7640G
DirectX
10
11 (11_0)+10%
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3600M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7640G). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3600M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 7640G).

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 7640G
Encoder
None
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP2)
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3600M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 7640G's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3600M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 7640G
TDP
189W
45W-76%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
2.5
10.1+304%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7640G (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3600MRadeon HD 7640G
MSRP
$50
Codename
GT200B
Turks
Release
November 11 2008
January 5 2012
Ranking
#815
#870

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.