Quadro FX 3700 vs Radeon HD 6480M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3700 vs Radeon HD 6480M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3700 vs Radeon HD 6480M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3700

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6480M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌25.2% higher power demand at 189W vs 151W.

Radeon HD 6480M

2010

Why buy it

✅6.7% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 151W instead of 189W, a 38W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6480M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.7% in average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 3700 instead at 372 vs 353, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6480M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 3700 vs Radeon HD 6480M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3700

The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 6480M

The Radeon HD 6480M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 353 points. Launch price was $239.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3700 scores 372 versus the Radeon HD 6480M's 353 — the Quadro FX 3700 leads by 5.4%. The Quadro FX 3700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6480M uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 6480M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700) vs 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6480M).

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Radeon HD 6480M
G3D Mark Score	372+5%	353
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	1120+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.016 TFLOPS+224%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+43%	56
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Radeon HD 6480M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700 and System on the Radeon HD 6480M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3700) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6480M) — the Radeon HD 6480M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Radeon HD 6480M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6480M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Radeon HD 6480M
DirectX	10_0	11.2 (11_0)+12%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3700 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6480M's 151W — a 22.4% difference. The Radeon HD 6480M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6480M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Radeon HD 6480M
TDP	189W	151W-20%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	2.0	2.3+15%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6480M (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Radeon HD 6480M
MSRP	$1599	—
Codename	GT200B	Barts
Release	November 11 2008	October 21 2010
Ranking	#815	#661

Search Quadro FX 3700 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6480M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.