GeForce GT 130 vs Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 130 vs Quadro FX 3700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 130 vs Quadro FX 3700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 130 vs Quadro FX 3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 130

2017

Why buy it

  • 3.8% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,499 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1537.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3700

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 130 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1499% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,599 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.8% in average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (381 vs 372), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 130 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,499 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1537.7% (3.8 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 130 vs Quadro FX 3700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700

The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700).

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
G3D Mark Score
381+2%
372
Architecture
Pascal
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+81%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 130 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3700 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 130 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 130) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3700) — the GeForce GT 130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB+200%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
DirectX
10.0
10_0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
TDP
30W-84%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
12.7+535%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 130 came in at $100, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599. On MSRP, GeForce GT 130 was 93.7% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3700) — the GeForce GT 130 offers 1800% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
MSRP
$100-94%
$1599
Performance per Dollar
3.8+1800%
0.2
Codename
GP108
GT200B
Release
May 17 2017
November 11 2008
Ranking
#641
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.