GeForce GT 130
VS
Quadro FX 3700

GeForce GT 130 vs Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 130 is positioned at rank 267 and the Quadro FX 3700 is on rank 401, so the GeForce GT 130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 130

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1904%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1829%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1808%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1805%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1801%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1791%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1768%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1762%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1745%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1741%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1720%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1716%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1685%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1684%
#252
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2100%
#267
GeForce GT 130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#268
Radeon M535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
98%
#269
Radeon HD 7310G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#271
Radeon HD 7450A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
94%
#272
Radeon HD 6450
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
94%
#273
Radeon HD 6230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#274
Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#275
Radeon E6760
MSRP: $240|Avg: $79
93%
#276
Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
93%
#278
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
91%
#279
Radeon R4
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
91%
#281
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
90%
#282
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700

#385
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
64230%
#400
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
100%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
100%
#402
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
96%
#403
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
87%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
87%
#406
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
78%
#408
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
74%
#409
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
70%
#410
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
70%
#412
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
52%
#413
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
43%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 130 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The GeForce GT 130 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3700.

InsightGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+200%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2460.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2460.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 130 and Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700

The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700).

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
G3D Mark Score
381+2%
372
Architecture
Pascal
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+81%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3700 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 130 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 130) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3700) — the GeForce GT 130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB+200%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
DirectX
10.0
10_0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
TDP
30W-84%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
12.7+535%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 130 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599 and now averages $500. The GeForce GT 130 costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) — the GeForce GT 130 offers 2628.6% better value. The GeForce GT 130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 130Quadro FX 3700
MSRP
$100-94%
$1599
Avg Price (30d)
$20-96%
$500
Performance per Dollar
19.1+2629%
0.7
Codename
GP108
GT200B
Release
May 17 2017
November 11 2008
Ranking
#641
#815