
Quadro FX 3700 vs Radeon HD 6490M

Quadro FX 3700
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6490M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700 is positioned at rank 401 and the Radeon HD 6490M is on rank 255, so the Radeon HD 6490M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6490M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6490M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3700.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | Radeon HD 6490M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6490M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700 and Radeon HD 6490M

Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 6490M
The Radeon HD 6490M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 378 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3700 scores 372 and the Radeon HD 6490M reaches 378 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6490M uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6490M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6490M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Radeon HD 6490M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 372 | 378+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 960+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.306 TFLOPS+110% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Radeon HD 6490M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3700) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6490M) — the Radeon HD 6490M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Radeon HD 6490M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3700 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6490M's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon HD 6490M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6490M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Radeon HD 6490M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 75W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 5.0+150% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6490M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Radeon HD 6490M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | — |
| Codename | GT200B | Blackcomb |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #654 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











